On 08/04/2006, at 4:13 AM, Robert Seeberger wrote:
During your absence I have posted several articles of this sort that question the factual nature of the "Official" 911 story. I find the subject, crazy or not, to be fascinating.
It was that there was no other mention of Charlie Sheen. The article was talking about one thing, then had one paragraph going on about Sheen, then went back to talking about Bowman. I saw from the link away from the original article that Sheen is a 9/11 questioner (as opposed to conspiracist), but even so, it's just glaringly bad writing to switch like that, without a clause of explanation...
Other than that, interesting stuff. Charlie _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
