On 08/04/2006, at 3:41 AM, Robert G. Seeberger wrote:
A mainstay of the attack pieces against Charlie Sheen have been that he is not credible enough to speak on the topic of 9/11. These charges are ridiculed by the fact that Sheen is an expert on 9/11 who spends hours a day meticulously researching the topic, something that the attack dogs have failed to do, aiming their comments solely at Sheen's personal life and ignoring his invitation to challenge him on the facts.
huh??? what was this doing in the middle or a serious piece..? eh? Charlie _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
