On Aug 16, 2005, at 5:01 PM, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
...who thinks that it was the product of a Jewish conspiracy launched to protect Israel instead of for the interests of the United States. That is, you know, not a minor point. Not to me, anways. If a very prominent supporter of the war (say, one whose family was killed on 9/11) said that he supported it because he wanted to kill Arabs, I sure as hell wouldn't be lining up behind him.
Show me where Cindy Sheehan has said anything even remotely as offensive as your cooked-up example.
I'd feel sorry for his grief, but I would not be making him _my_ spokesman, and I wouldn't carefully orchestrate a media campaign to make him the face of my movement.
She made herself her own spokesperson, or are you still deluded enough to believe that she was somehow duped into this?
Now, you _have_ chosen to do that. That is, of course, your choice. But don't pretend that it's not possible to draw conclusions from that choice either.
From the choices you've made today -- ad hominem attacks, guilt by association, putting words into Cindy Sheehan's mouth, I draw the conclusion that you and your kind are scared shitless of her and the attention she's bringing to this completely unjustified war of aggression. Dave _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
