On 5/19/05, JDG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At 09:47 PM 5/18/2005 EDT, Bob wrote: > As a scientist, I am sure that you agree that the unborn child is, in > fact, > homo sapiens. So, what you are really saying is that there are some > humans who do not enjoy the protection of human rights. > > So, why are you so quick to defend an American legal system that extends > the protection of human rights at the moment a child leaves the womb of > his > or her mother, with the intent of the mother? Or do you have other > criteria for cases in which human rights should not be extended to certain > humans? >
Why are you condemning the American legal system Why do you hate America? ;-) I would support human rights for sentient non-humans. In the case of a fetus I might fall back on the ancient religious doctrine that the soul enters the body with the first breath. Like Jesus as a rabbi and religious teacher would have believed and elements of the language of the Bible imply. ;-) -- Gary Denton Easter Lemming Blogs http://elemming.blogspot.com http://elemming2.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
