----- Original Message ----- From: "Warren Ockrassa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 5:11 PM Subject: Re: Acts of War
> On Dec 24, 2004, at 3:08 PM, JDG wrote: > > > At 03:57 PM 12/24/2004 -0600 Dan Minette wrote: > >>>>> I can only see it as strategic to Iraq if their purpose was to pull > >>>>> the > >>>>> West into the region in order to touch off a larger conflict. If > >>>>> it > >>>>> was > >>>>> to actually try to expand their borders, they were nuts, a > >>>>> possibility > >>>>> that cannot be discounted! > >>>> > >>>> Nuts? > >>>> > >>>> If your man, John Kerry, had been President, the US wouldn't have > >>>> even > >>>> attempted to stop him. > >>> > >>> That's pure conjecture and you know it. > >> > >> Not really. It is only based on the assumption that John Kerry votes > >> on > >> principal. > > > > Just in case Dan didn't spell it out.... > > > > John Kerry, after all, voted against that war. > > Kerry didn't have enough principle to clearly vote against *or* for the > war. That was one of the things Duh-bya harped on: "Flip-flop! > Flip-flop!" Gulf War I, not Gulf War II was being referenced. > Interesting that amid all the noise about who knows history and who > doesn't, we're seeing the history of the last three months so clearly > being edited, redacted and entirely manufactured in the minds of so > many alleged conservatives. I voted for Kerry. I was also opposed to Desert Storm at the time, thinking that it would be a protracted struggle that would cause the kind of complications we see in Gulf War II. My predictive power was much better for Gulf War II than it was for Gulf War I, alas. Dan M. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
