--- Alberto Monteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... I claim that has _already_ been oriented to them
> in the past 50 or so years, where _no_ significant
> disease has found a final _cure_.
> 
> Alberto Monteiro

The problem, Alberto, is that the antibiotics were
discovered a little bit before that.  Anti-viral
research is hard.  No one has ever succeeded at that. 
Why, exactly, do you blame the pharma companies for
not succeeding in doing something that no one has ever
succeeded in doing?  They have successfully managed to
cure every bacterial disease - that's a pretty good
record.

Also, btw, you're completely ignoring the enormous
progress that has been made against (for example)
cancer.  A generation ago (I don't remember the exact
numbers, but these will be roughly correct) the
majority of pediatric cancer patients died.  Now it's
under a quarter.  Almost all of that improvement is
due to the work of the pharmaceutical companies, and
that's just a beginning.

So if your argument is "We can't beat cancer with one
pill, and I blame the pharmacos", well, blame them all
you want, but unless you want to point out to me the
huge medical advances that (for example) the Soviet
Union made I think you've got a pretty difficult
situation trying to prove that this is because of a
choice on their part.

As the chief of R&D at a very large pharmaco said in
an interview a couple of weeks ago - "This isn't
rocket science.  This is _much harder_ than rocket
science."  You can see a rocket.  You know exactly how
a rocket works.  We don't (for example) understand the
liver at all well - we barely understand it at all,
really.  Drug development is harder now because all of
the low-hanging fruit - the bacterial diseases and the
easy vaccines, basically - have already been plucked. 
Now the really hard slog is there.  Despite that fact,
the same pharma companies that you criticize have
managed to change AIDS from a fatal to chronic disease
and improve the survival rates for most forms of
cancer by _multiples_.  Do you think that was _easy_? 
Merck has more Nobel prize winners on staff than most
universities - they didn't win all of those because
they do poor work.  They won them because they do
extraordinary work on exceptionally difficult areas of research.

=====
Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Freedom is not free"
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com


                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to