On 30 Apr 2004, at 1:33 am, Tom Beck wrote:
Again, leaving out important information.
Such as? You make an accusation and then leave it hanging. So who's really "leaving out important information"?
This is becoming a habit. Can we call it democratic truth avoidance?
Can we call it a quick-and-dirty post to a freaking mailing list, not a comprehensive report to a Congressional committee or a true bill of indictment presented to a grand jury?
If one side of a debate tries to be fair and balanced and the the other side does not then the middle ground ends up 3/4 over to the side that doesn't. That's why people take extreme positions. So the 'compromise' is nearer to what they really wanted in the first place :)
-Don't haggle me Maru
-- William T Goodall Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs. -- Robert Firth
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
