---------- From: Kevin Tarr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At 09:10 PM 4/28/2004, you wrote:
><<http://www.news-press.com/news/local_state/040426land.html>> > >Land seized for private use possible > >Legislation would help developers Ahh, another place where the fool's and my views intersect. Would she support going the other way; land should only be seized for eminent domain in very narrow cases, like a road, but not for schools, public parks, or athletic fields? ---- Roads & Schools.
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
