> Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Robert Seeberger wrote:
> > > > From: "Deborah Harrell"

> > > > Democrats 'sex-crazed pantywaists.'  :P

> > > Shouldn't the "sex crazed" have their panties
> 'round their knees? At the least?
> >
> > Ro-BER-er-ert! <bit of a lilt, there>
> > Now that's taking snippage too far!  You've given
> some
> > brand-new brineller the impression that I'm part
> of the VRWC!  ;)
 
> Think not thusly Debba Debba Deb. I think the
> understood gist relayed
> is that *I* question the "sex crazed" wearing
> panties around their waists.

Oh, dear, I thought that between the "lilting tone"
and the smiley my amusement was obvious... 

> There is just too little there from you to make
> judgement on, and that
> is as I planned it.
> Since I was changing the entire character of the
> discussion, I wanted
> as little of what went previously left as possible,
> and enough to
> bring smiles to the faces of the members of the VLWC
> who view
> themselves as sexy and desireable. Hence the
> remaining "Democrats".
<snip> 
> Its also why Ann Coulter is so mean.
> If you had to get a
> full wax every other day so you could protect
> yourself with duct tape
> you would be chock full of attitude too.

<winces dramatically>

> > And _boy_ did this thread sink to the gutter
> > fast...that really was _not_ my intention...  :P
 
> No, it was mine. You are absolved. Dominus vobiscum.

Well, I actually *was* interested in hearing other
opinions on the emulation bit...you thread-hijacker!

Debbi
who has plenty of attitude without any waxing at
all...
...Primer Gray Maru?   <wicked grin>

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to