> From: Doug Pensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Culled from the MCMedia archive as my email program seems to be eating
old 
> messages in my brin-l folder.
> 
> JDG wrote:
> 
> <<
> As I have hinted earlier, if I were forced to cast a vote, I would vote
in
> favor of the "Federal Marriage Amendment."   This is despite the fact,
as
> noted earlier, that I don't particularly buy into the argument that gay
> marriage is this imminent threat to heterosexual marriages.
> 
> Anyhow, for those of you who are not familiar with it, the text of the
only
> proposed Amendment with a chance of passage is here:
> 
> "Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man
> and a woman. Neither this Constitution or the Constitution of any
State,
> nor state or Federal Law, shall be construed to require that marital
status
> or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or 
> groups"
> 
> Despite the rhetoric of some opponents, I find it very difficult to
read
> the above amendment is making civil unions unconstitutional.   Rather,
it
> says to me that no Constitution can be interpreted by the Courts as
> *requiring* civil unions, but that legislatures are free to instutiute
> civil unions through the appropriate democratic processes.    At any
rate,
> this is certainly the outcome I am advocating - and the outcome that is
> advocated by the Amendment's primary sponsors.
> >>
> 
> What it says to me is that it is OK  to outlaw civil unions or any
aspect 
> of them.  That SSUs can never expect to have the same rights conferred 
> upon them that  traditional marriages do and that homosexuals are
thereby 
> second class citizens.  IMO it is therefore in conflict with the 14th 
> amendment.  Furthermore, because there are religious aspects to the 
> concept of marriage, the proposed amendment is also in conflict with
the 
> second amendment.

What it says to me is that it is a ban on ALL new marriages both
heterosexual and homosexual.  It will remove all 1049 'marriage' rights
that now exist for all existing married couples.  It will make it so that
_only_ religions can 'marry' people, and only heterosexuals.

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to