Richard Baker wrote: > > Even if we disregard polyamorous relationships > or whatever, surely friendship is one of the bases of civil society - > so why not formally recognise friendships in law? > And what prevents a group of people to create a new firm whose purpose is just to share their hourse? This would be the equivalent of a civil union of two [or more] people, possibly with the same sex.
Maybe that's the path to "gay marriage", without offending the big... oops conservatives: make those unions easier by decreasing the bureucracy. Alberto Monteiro _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
