From: Alberto Monteiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> Alternatively, a lesbian couple could pair with a compatible gay male
>> couple, and sperm from both men could be inserted inside both women.
>> One child could live with the men and one with the women (assuming they
>> don't all want to live together in one house). The children could grow
>> up knowing all of their parents. Sounds healthy and happy to me.
>>
>No, this is wrong and evil.

>But, OTOH, lesbians should be _incentivated_ to have children. The
>reason is simple: heterosexual women chose the father of their
>children based on primate instincts that are quite obsole and archaic,
>and that do not produce an improvement of the Human race. Lesbians
>would chose the father of the children only based on the quality
>of the DNA, and this would _greatly_ improve Humanity.

>I think all heterosexual woman should be sterilized and only lesbians
>should be allowed to have children.

I have read this debate, and bitten my tounge.
I am assuming yours is firmly planted in your cheek here...
 
If you want to claim that we know more about how best to 
"improve" the genetic reliability of humanity than the universe does,
then you will have an arguement from me.
 
Perhaps, and I say perhaps as a means of keeping an open mind,
if you could tell me what the point, the direction, the aim of genetic 
"improvement" is... then perhaps, one day, with the benefit of hindsight,
we may come close to being as good at natural selection is as nature is.
 
So, until then, we can tweak all we like,but it aint gonna go close
to the skillfull outcome of wheel of time and evolution.
 
But you are Joking Maru
 
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to