At 03:20 PM 1/3/2004 -0800 Doug Pensinger wrote:
>John wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Come again? My own introduction to this link was only a few sentences
>> long, and said no such thing, and I don't even recall such a thing being
>> stated by the author of the piece I linked to......
>
>You wrote on 25 December:
>
><<I know of no instance in which Limbaugh contest the right of a citizen to
>have his or her medical records protected from unreasonable search.
>
>The editorial which prompted the title for this thread referenced a case in
>which the Supreme Court held that the Constitution emmanated a penumbra
> from which was brought forth a right to privacy that protected one's right
>to do whatever one wanted, even when the police should happen to stumble
>into said bedroom on a legal search warrant.
>
>Clearly, the two are very much different.>>
>
>http://www.mccmedia.com/pipermail/brin-l/Week-of-Mon-20031222/031421.html
O.k. well, you didn't make it at all clear that you were referring to
something that I said a week ago. As it is, shortly after I posted that,
I was away from the List for five days while I was back home, and I'm sure
that I probably lost some follow-ups in the backlog.
I went back and dug up the thread I think that was in, and tried to
legitimately respond to any questions and comments that seemed particularly
directed to me.
Anyhow, I think that I meant to include "with consenting adults" after
"whatever one wanted." Obviously, I am not naiive enough to say that The
Supreme Court held that one could get away with murder if one wanted. I
apologize for not being more clear in what I said, and I hope that this
answers your question.
JDG
_______________________________________________________
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world,
it is God's gift to humanity." - George W. Bush 1/29/03
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
