John wrote:



Come again? My own introduction to this link was only a few sentences long, and said no such thing, and I don't even recall such a thing being stated by the author of the piece I linked to......

You wrote on 25 December:


<<I know of no instance in which Limbaugh contest the right of a citizen to
have his or her medical records protected from unreasonable search.

The editorial which prompted the title for this thread referenced a case in
which the Supreme Court held that the Constitution emmanated a penumbra
from which was brought forth a right to privacy that protected one's right
to do whatever one wanted, even when the police should happen to stumble
into said bedroom on a legal search warrant.

Clearly, the two are very much different.>>

http://www.mccmedia.com/pipermail/brin-l/Week-of-Mon-20031222/031421.html

--
Doug
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to