> From: Reggie Bautista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > JDG wrote: > > > >From Greg Easterbrook: > > > Among other things, this book maintains that accounts of resurrection > >or walking on water should not put any rationalist off from faith, since > >who can say what is possible from the standpoint of higher knowledge? > > > > > Rationalists of previous centuries would have considered the Boeing 747 > >forbidden by physical law, or declared reports of heart transplants to be > >absurd superstition. > > The Fool replied: > >And Rain really does come from "doors" in the firmament, and there really > >are storehouses for snow up there. And giants, dragons, cocatrices, and > >satyrs really exist! And the Earth really IS flat, holding up the > >firmament on pillars, and being held up by pillars, and has seven > >corners. And worldwide global flood did occur, in 40 days no less > >(30.3FT /Hour). And All the saints really were reserected and marched > >through jerusalem despite the fact that no historian ever knew about it. > >And insects really do only have four legs. And some people really will > >believe any bullshit thats in a 'sacred' book. > > Way to address JDG's actual argument, The Fool. Nice to know that you would > never resort to the strawman argument of using examples that the other > person never used.
Fuck me if I didn't mention the biggest so-called ressurection in the book of lies. I walk on water all the time, it's called ICE. So where is the proof that someone could walk on liquid water 2000 years ago? I havn't seen it. His argument is worthless. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
