> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Dan Minette
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 11:22 PM
> To: Killer Bs Discussion
> Subject: Re: Incest
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Reggie Bautista" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Incest
> 
> 
> > >>William T Goodall wrote:
> > >>>And I'm not even sure what a second cousin twice removed is...
> >
> > I replied:
> > [snip]
> > >>So your second cousin, twice removed, would be either your father
or
> > >>mother's cousin's great-grandchild or their great-grandparent).
> >
> > Jon responded:
> > >Wasn't this a Heinlein plot?
> > >
> > >Sheesh.
> >
> > I kept trying to come up with a witty rejoinder to that, but all the
> ones
> I
> > could think of required higher math to trace out the
relationships... ;-
> )
> >
> > Reggie Bautista
> 
> Nah, just base two.

Or perhaps just English rules of grammar?

Jon
GSV Conjunction Junction
VFP What's Your Function?

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to