From: Ronn!Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Man wins tie sex ruling Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:18:34 -0600
At 11:30 AM 3/11/03 -0800, Miller, Jeffrey wrote:
> -----Original Message----- > From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 08:19 AM > To: Killer Bs Discussion > Subject: Re: Man wins tie sex ruling > > > William T Goodall wrote: > > > Ties are for weddings and funerals, not for daily life. > > I like dress codes based on some very simple premises. > > Frex, the dress code based on the two following premises: > > 1) Nobody wants to smell anyone else's BO. > > 2) Nobody wants to see your underwear. > > (Of course, in the case of 2), some females might have gotten > away with not conforming to that one when the boss was out....)
Not here. We have a strict, company-wide rule that's actually printed in the Employee Handbook: "Proper undergarmets must be worn at all times"
-jeffrey-
GSV There's always a story
Someone complained that male employees were being distracted from their work by female employees who were not wearing all of the undergarments considered proper and necessary, perhaps?
What guy would complain about that? :)
Well.... what _straight guy with a heartbeat_ would complain about that?
Jon Sir Mixalot Maru
-- Ronn! :)
Your message here!
(Call for rates.)
Erhem. Call where? J
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
