On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 07:32:02 +0200 [email protected] wrote: > >> @@ -1140,7 +1148,7 @@ static int __br_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, > >> struct net_bridge *br, > >> err = br_fdb_external_learn_add(br, p, addr, vid, true); > >> } else { > >> spin_lock_bh(&br->hash_lock); > >> - err = fdb_add_entry(br, p, addr, ndm, nlh_flags, vid, nfea_tb); > >> + err = fdb_add_entry(br, p, addr, ndm, nlh_flags, vid, > >> ext_flags, > >> nfea_tb); > > > > I believe the preference is to wrap to 80 columns when possible. > > Very strange... since I ran checkpatch.pl from the net-next kernel > itself and it did not > give me any warnings about 80 columns, but rather said 'patch is ready > for submission'. > > As this is silent, could it be some missing python plugins or something > to do with perl?
I run: ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict --max-line-length=80
