On 2022-10-20 14:55, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 06:56:10PM +0200, Hans J. Schultz wrote:
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
index 8f3d76c751dd..c6b938c01a74 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static void br_switchdev_fdb_populate(struct
net_bridge *br,
item->added_by_user = test_bit(BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER, &fdb->flags);
item->offloaded = test_bit(BR_FDB_OFFLOADED, &fdb->flags);
item->is_local = test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCAL, &fdb->flags);
+ item->locked = test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCKED, &fdb->flags);
Shouldn't this be set to 0 here, since it is the bridge->driver
direction?
Wouldn't it be a good idea to allow drivers to add what corresponds to a
blackhole
entry when using the bridge input chain to activate the MAB feature, or
in general
to leave the decision of what to do to the driver implementation?
