Sean Chittenden wrote: >> For sure it is. Debian is my primary platform and I'd like this to >> be seamless. I've pondered support for multiple simultaneous >> installations, possibly with a layout like this: > > Because of the trickery of the loader using unresolved symlinks (for > non-statically linked apps, but who does that with boost?), please > don't do something convenient like: > > /usr > local > lib > boost-1.40.0 > boost-1.41.0 > boost -> boost-1.41.0 > > Lazy developers will use boost and not boost-1.40.0 and suddenly > things will break in strange, hard to figure out ways.
Could you clarify what will break? - Volodya _______________________________________________ Boost-cmake mailing list Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
