Excerpts from Sean Chittenden's message of Wed Oct 28 20:39:59 +0100 2009: > Avoid pkg-config, it's very Linux and drags in a ton of dependencies > (most of the time, never required, but that's the way it goes with > everyone's packaging system of choice). A cmake variable would be > preferred, imo (similar to the cmake boost version foo). -sc
So let's make pkg-config opt-in? What ton of dependencies are you referring to? How's it linuxy? Do you mean that it's not convenient on non-unix? pkg-config is quite useful on linux distributions. I largely prefer using pkg-config over going back to having a gazillion foo-config binaries. -- Exherbo KDE, X.org maintainer _______________________________________________ Boost-cmake mailing list Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
