Denis Arnaud wrote:
2009/10/28 troy d. straszheim <t...@resophonic.com
<mailto:t...@resophonic.com>>
Would it be possible to have the option, with CMake build, to
use a
more conventional soname, so that Linux distribution packagers
(Debianers and RPM-based packagers such as me, for instance) be
happy (i.e., have less extra code to write)?
So, like this (?):
% ls -l build/lib
total 1352
libboost_iostreams-mt-d.a
libboost_iostreams-mt-d.so -> libboost_iostreams-mt-d.so.1.41*
libboost_iostreams-mt-d.so.1.41 -> libboost_iostreams-mt-d.so.1.41.0*
libboost_iostreams-mt-d.so.1.41.0*
libboost_iostreams-mt.a
libboost_iostreams-mt.so -> libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.41*
libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.41 -> libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.41.0*
libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.41.0*
Yes, exactly :)
And the soname would read something like:
$ readelf -a /usr/lib/libboost_date_time-mt.so | grep -i soname
0x0000000e (SONAME) Library soname:
[libboost_date_time-mt.so.4]
(that example is taken from Fedora 11, with Boost 1.37.0; the soname
version is fixed within the RPM specification file).
% readelf -a build/lib/libboost_iostreams-mt.so | grep SONAME
0x000000000000000e (SONAME) Library soname:
[libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.41]
OK?
-t
_______________________________________________
Boost-cmake mailing list
Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
