2009/10/28 troy d. straszheim <t...@resophonic.com> > Would it be possible to have the option, with CMake build, to use a >> more conventional soname, so that Linux distribution packagers >> (Debianers and RPM-based packagers such as me, for instance) be >> happy (i.e., have less extra code to write)? >> >> So, like this (?): > > % ls -l build/lib > total 1352 > libboost_iostreams-mt-d.a > libboost_iostreams-mt-d.so -> libboost_iostreams-mt-d.so.1.41* > libboost_iostreams-mt-d.so.1.41 -> libboost_iostreams-mt-d.so.1.41.0* > libboost_iostreams-mt-d.so.1.41.0* > libboost_iostreams-mt.a > libboost_iostreams-mt.so -> libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.41* > libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.41 -> libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.41.0* > libboost_iostreams-mt.so.1.41.0* >
Yes, exactly :) And the soname would read something like: $ readelf -a /usr/lib/libboost_date_time-mt.so | grep -i soname 0x0000000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libboost_date_time-mt.so.4] (that example is taken from Fedora 11, with Boost 1.37.0; the soname version is fixed within the RPM specification file).
_______________________________________________ Boost-cmake mailing list Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
