Thanks! In that case, LGTM to use origin trials for this otherwise
web-invisible experiment. :)

-mike

On Tue 5. Oct 2021 at 09:51 Andreas Haas <ah...@google.com> wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> We want to use the Origin Trial to get some early information from
> partners, but then plan to ship with a finch trial and roll it out step by
> step while observing the impact on webpages we are not directly aware of.
>
> Cheers,
> Andreas
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 6:58 PM Mike West <mk...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> If this doesn’t have web-visible behavioral impact, I don’t think you
>> generally need API owner approval. In this case, I think it’s reasonable to
>> ask for such approval, as you want to use Origin Trials to more clearly
>> involve partners in the experimentation process, do their own A/B testing,
>> etc.
>>
>> I think a marginally-longer-than-usual experiment lifetime is fine here,
>> since there’s zero burn-in risk (again, because there’s no behavioral
>> change).
>>
>> I am, though, a little concerned about the validity of any data you
>> obtain via this self-selected mechanism. Will you be running a more-typical
>> percentage trial at the same time to evaluate the impact of the change more
>> broadly?
>>
>> -mike
>>
>> On Mon 4. Oct 2021 at 18:08 Andreas Haas <ah...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 5:39 PM Mike West <mk...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 10:04 AM 'Andreas Haas' via blink-dev <
>>>> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Contact emailsah...@chromium.org
>>>>>
>>>>> ExplainerAt the moment, V8 compiles WebAssembly modules by first
>>>>> compiling all functions with the baseline compiler Liftoff, and then
>>>>> immediately compiling all functions with the optimizing compiler TurboFan,
>>>>> see https://v8.dev/docs/wasm-compilation-pipeline. On some websites
>>>>> we see that TurboFan compilation can block JavaScript workers from
>>>>> execution. With WebAssembly dynamic tiering we want to reduce the CPU time
>>>>> of TurboFan compilation by only optimizing functions which were already
>>>>> executed a few times.
>>>>>
>>>>> SpecificationThis feature is just a new implementation of an already
>>>>> implemented specification.
>>>>>
>>>>> Summary
>>>>>
>>>>> With WebAssembly Dynamic Tiering, an heuristic decides which functions
>>>>> of a WebAssembly module get optimized, and when the optimization is
>>>>> triggered. This is an improvement to the existing eager optimization
>>>>> approach, where all functions get optimized immediately after baseline
>>>>> compilation is finished. WebAssembly Dynamic Tiering reduces the resource
>>>>> consumption of the optimizing compiler, and prevents the compiler from
>>>>> competing with the web application for resources.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blink componentBlink>JavaScript>WebAssembly
>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EJavaScript%3EWebAssembly>
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG reviewNot applicable
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review statusNot applicable
>>>>>
>>>>> Risks
>>>>> WebAssembly dynamic tiering may lead to unexpected performance
>>>>> regressions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Gecko: No signal
>>>>>
>>>>> WebKit: No signal
>>>>>
>>>>> Web developers: No signals
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My understanding is that this doesn't create any web-facing change in
>>>> behavior, but only a potential change in performance?
>>>>
>>>> In that case, then signals and TAG review and etc. all seem quite
>>>> reasonable to skip. :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Goals for experimentation
>>>>>
>>>>> The goal of the experiment is to allow important partners to
>>>>> experiment with the performance impact of WebAssembly dynamic tiering. 
>>>>> This
>>>>> feature may change the startup behavior of WebAssembly code significantly,
>>>>> which is why we would like to experiment in the guarded environment of an
>>>>> origin trial first.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reason this experiment is being extended
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ongoing technical constraints
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>
>>>>> Debugging behavior does not change
>>>>>
>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>> ?Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Flag nameWebAssemblyDynamicTiering
>>>>>
>>>>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>>>>
>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>>
>>>>> No milestones specified
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can you specify milestones? :) How many releases do you need in order
>>>> to evaluate the impact?
>>>>
>>>> We would like to do the experiment from M96 until M102. We would like
>>> to improve the heuristics for when to optimize over time, which requires
>>> the longer time span.
>>>
>>>
>>>> -mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5685307493056512
>>>>>
>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> <https://www.chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAELSTveTudJkMbuBMyZ%2BZTv334audVik78gEJTzmjym4X6wJTg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAELSTveTudJkMbuBMyZ%2BZTv334audVik78gEJTzmjym4X6wJTg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
>> -mike
>>
> --
-mike

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAKXHy%3DfTE2205jtX9W-NYrsE4RUtJ8NcDYaUTAxobgtxaP2j2g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to