bitcoin-development  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit Raystonn .
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit Gavin Andresen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit Raystonn .
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit David Vorick
• [Bitcoin-development] BIP for PoP URI scheme Kalle Rosenbaum
• [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Tom Harding
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Luke Dashjr
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Tom Harding
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Tom Harding
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Luke Dashjr
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment Kalle Rosenbaum
• [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Rusty Russell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Rusty Russell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Wladimir J. van der Laan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Danny Thorpe
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Rusty Russell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Rusty Russell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Jorge Timón
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Rusty Russell
  • [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Re: [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Jorge Timón
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Canonical input and output ordering in transactions Kristov Atlas
• [Bitcoin-development] Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs Kristov Atlas
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs Stephen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs Kristov Atlas
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs Kristov Atlas
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs Kristov Atlas
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs Kristov Atlas
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs Kristov Atlas
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs Kristov Atlas
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs Kristov Atlas
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs Rusty Russell
• [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin core 0.11.0 release candidate 1 available Wladimir J. van der Laan
• [Bitcoin-development] Tough questions for Peter Todd, Chief Scientist {Mastercoin | Counterparty | Coinkite | Darkwallet | Viacoin} Sven Berg
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Tough questions for Peter Todd, Chief Scientist {Mastercoin | Counterparty | Coinkite | Darkwallet | Viacoin} Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Tough questions for Peter Todd, Chief Scientist {Mastercoin | Counterparty | Coinkite | Darkwallet | Viacoin} Daniel Stadulis
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Tough questions for Peter Todd, Chief Scientist {Mastercoin | Counterparty | Coinkite | Darkwallet | Viacoin} Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Tough questions for Peter Todd, Chief Scientist {Mastercoin | Counterparty | Coinkite | Darkwallet | Viacoin} Sven Berg
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Tough questions for Peter Todd, Chief Scientist {Mastercoin | Counterparty | Coinkite | Darkwallet | Viacoin} Braun Brelin
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Tough questions for Peter Todd, Chief Scientist {Mastercoin | Counterparty | Coinkite | Darkwallet | Viacoin} Sven Berg
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Tough questions for Peter Todd, Chief Scientist {Mastercoin | Counterparty | Coinkite | Darkwallet | Viacoin} Kristov Atlas
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Tough questions for Peter Todd, Chief Scientist {Mastercoin | Counterparty | Coinkite | Darkwallet | Viacoin} Gavin
• Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 49, Issue 16 Ron
• Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements‏ cipher anthem
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements‏ Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements‏ Nathan Cook
• [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement signalled via sequence numbers Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement signalled via sequence numbers Stephen Morse
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement signalled via sequence numbers Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement signalled via sequence numbers Stephen Morse
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement signalled via sequence numbers Tier Nolan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement signalled via sequence numbers Stephen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement signalled via sequence numbers Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement signalled via sequence numbers Stephen Morse
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement signalled via sequence numbers Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement signalled via sequence numbers Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement signalled via sequence numbers Gregory Maxwell
• [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate Mats Henricson
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate gabe appleton
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate Ethan Heilman
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate gabe appleton
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate Pindar Wong
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate gabe appleton
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate Pindar Wong
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate gabe appleton
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate Pindar Wong
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate gabe appleton
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size debate gabe appleton
• [Bitcoin-development] Why do we need a MAX_BLOCK_SIZE at all? Jim Phillips
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Why do we need a MAX_BLOCK_SIZE at all? Stephen Morse
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Why do we need a MAX_BLOCK_SIZE at all? Jim Phillips
  • [Bitcoin-development] We are filling most blocks right now - Let's change the max blocksize default Raystonn .
• [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks) Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks) Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks) Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks) Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks) Tom Harding
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks) Richard Moore
• Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step Jérôme Legoupil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step Gavin Andresen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step Jameson Lopp
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step Eric Voskuil
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step odinn
• Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements Thy Shizzle
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements Thy Shizzle
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements Warren Togami Jr.
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements Btc Drak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements Thy Shizzle
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Block Size Increase Requirements Pindar Wong
• [Bitcoin-development] Max Block Size: Simple Voting Procedure Stephen Morse
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Max Block Size: Simple Voting Procedure Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Max Block Size: Simple Voting Procedure Stephen Morse
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Max Block Size: Simple Voting Procedure Stephen Morse
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Max Block Size: Simple Voting Procedure Vincent Truong
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Max Block Size: Simple Voting Procedure Stephen Morse
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Max Block Size: Simple Voting Procedure Pindar Wong
• [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: A measured response to save Bitcoin Core Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: A measured response to save Bitcoin Core s7r
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: A measured response to save Bitcoin Core Btc Drak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: A measured response to save Bitcoin Core Eric Lombrozo
• [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks) Re: Proposed alternatives to the 20MB stepfunction Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks) Re: Proposed alternatives to the 20MB stepfunction Gavin Andresen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks) Re: Proposed alternatives to the 20MB stepfunction Raystonn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase (extension blocks) Re: Proposed alternatives to the 20MB stepfunction Andrew
• [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Tier Nolan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Jorge Timón
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Telephone Lemien
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Tier Nolan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Tier Nolan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers s7r
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Tier Nolan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Tier Nolan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Tier Nolan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Consensus-enforced transaction replacement via sequence numbers Rusty Russell
• [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal Douglas Roark
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal Luke Dashjr
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal Jorge Timón
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal Tier Nolan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal Tier Nolan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal Sergio Lerner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal Patrick Strateman
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal Christian Decker
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal Potter QQ
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal Jorge Timón
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version bits proposal Pieter Wuille
• Re: [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90% Raystonn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Cost savings by using replace-by-fee, 30-90% Allen Piscitello
• [Bitcoin-development] please remove me from the list Da Xu
• [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Survey Paper Florian Tschorsch
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Survey Paper Daniel Kraft
• [Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee Tom Harding
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee Tom Harding
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee Tom Harding
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee Danny Thorpe
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee Danny Thorpe
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee Peter Todd
  • [Bitcoin-development] First-Seen-Safe Replace-by-Fee patch against Bitcoin Core v0.10.2 Peter Todd
• [Bitcoin-development] Zero-Conf for Full Node Discovery Jim Phillips
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Zero-Conf for Full Node Discovery Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Zero-Conf for Full Node Discovery Kevin Greene
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Zero-Conf for Full Node Discovery Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Zero-Conf for Full Node Discovery Kevin Greene
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Zero-Conf for Full Node Discovery Luke Dashjr
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Zero-Conf for Full Node Discovery Jim Phillips
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Zero-Conf for Full Node Discovery Matt Whitlock

• Earlier messages
• Later messages