bitcoin-development  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Bitcoin-development] soft-fork block size increase(extensionblocks) Tom Harding
• [Bitcoin-development] Lost proposals from FellowTraveler/Monetas Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Lost proposals from FellowTraveler/Monetas Justus Ranvier
• Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market Raystonn
• [Bitcoin-development] Test Jakub Lacko
• [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Bryan Bishop
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Faiz Khan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Brian Hoffman
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork &non-consensus hard-fork Raystonn .
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Alex Morcos
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Jorge Timón
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Pindar Wong
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Pindar Wong
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork odinn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Eric Lombrozo
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Venzen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Marcel Jamin
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Benjamin
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Tier Nolan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Troy Benjegerdes
• [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Eric Lombrozo
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Eric Lombrozo
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Eric Lombrozo
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Eric Lombrozo
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Rebroad (sourceforge)
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Raystonn .
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Adam Back
  • [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market Raystonn .
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market sick...@gmail.com
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market Raystonn .
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market sick...@gmail.com
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market Kevin Greene
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market Luke Dashjr
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market Kevin Greene
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market Kevin Greene
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market justusranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market Potter QQ
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market justusranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] The Bitcoin Node Market devrandom
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] comments on BIP 100 Jeff Garzik
• [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity Warren Togami Jr.
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity Warren Togami Jr.
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity odinn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity Warren Togami Jr.
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity grarpamp
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity Davide Cavion
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity odinn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity Adam Weiss
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity Pieter Wuille
• [Bitcoin-development] The timechain: an idea to solve TX malleability in smart contract protocols with minimal involvement and without requiring a fork. Matthew Roberts
• [Bitcoin-development] The timechain: an idea to solve TX malleability in smart contract protocols without requiring a fork. Matthew Roberts
• [Bitcoin-development] Various block size proposals Bryan Bishop
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Various block size proposals Pindar Wong
• [Bitcoin-development] Bip 32 Question James Poole
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bip 32 Question William Swanson
• [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Jannes Faber
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Eric Lombrozo
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Vincent Truong
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Luke Dashjr
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Aaron Gustafson
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Benjamin
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Aaron Gustafson
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Danny Thorpe
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Eric Lombrozo
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Chun Wang
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Eric Lombrozo
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Eric Lombrozo
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Mats Henricson
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Benjamin
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees odinn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Eric Lombrozo
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Eric Lombrozo
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Stephen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Eric Lombrozo
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Ashley Holman
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Raystonn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees odinn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees odinn
• [Bitcoin-development] Mining centralization pressure from non-uniform propagation speed Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mining centralization pressure from non-uniform propagation speed Gavin Andresen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mining centralization pressure from non-uniform propagation speed Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mining centralization pressure from non-uniform propagation speed Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mining centralization pressure from non-uniform propagation speed Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mining centralization pressure from non-uniform propagation speed Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mining centralization pressure from non-uniform propagation speed Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mining centralization pressure from non-uniform propagation speed Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mining centralization pressure from non-uniform propagation speed Jonas Nick
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mining centralization pressure from non-uniform propagation speed Tom Harding
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mining centralization pressure from non-uniform propagation speed Yifu Guo
• [Bitcoin-development] Miners: You'll (very likely) need to upgrade your Bitcoin Core node soon to support BIP66 Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Miners: You'll (very likely) need to upgrade your Bitcoin Core node soon to support BIP66 Tier Nolan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Miners: You'll (very likely) need to upgrade your Bitcoin Core node soon to support BIP66 Pieter Wuille
• [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Nathan Wilcox
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Nathan Wilcox
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Nathan Wilcox
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Nathan Wilcox
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Martin Lie
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Tom Harding
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Aaron Voisine
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: SPV Fee Discovery mechanism Nathan Wilcox
• [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? xor
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Wladimir J. van der Laan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Ivan Brightly
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Troy Benjegerdes
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Ivan Brightly
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? s7r
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Wladimir J. van der Laan
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Troy Benjegerdes
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Andy Schroder
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is SourceForge still trustworthy enough to host this list? Troy Benjegerdes
• [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Experiment Underway Tom Harding
  • [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit Raystonn .
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit Raystonn .
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the blocksize limit Raystonn .
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit Raystonn .
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the blocksize limit Raystonn .
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the blocksize limit Btc Drak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the blocksize limit Raystonn .
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the blocksize limit Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the blocksize limit Raystonn .
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit Bob McElrath
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit Loi Luu
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit Gavin Andresen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New attack identified and potential solution described: Dropped-transaction spam attack against the block size limit Tier Nolan

• Earlier messages
• Later messages