Peter Todd <p...@petertodd.org> writes: > That said, if people have strong feelings about this, I would be willing > to make OP_CLTV work as follows: > > <nLockTime> 1 OP_CLTV > > Where the 1 selects absolute mode, and all others act as OP_NOP's. A > future relative CLTV could then be a future soft-fork implemented as > follows: > > <relative nLockTime> 2 OP_CLTV
Mildly prefer to put that the other way around. ie. the OP_NOP1 becomes OP_EXTENSION_PREFIX, the next op defines which extended opcode it is (must be a push). Cheers, Rusty. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development