> Perhaps better thing to do is to also delay the _forwarding_ of these > blocks _and_ blocks that extend them, until extended one more time.
Excellent idea, that gets the incentives right. RE: fixing the root cause with a forking change: What do other people think? I think it is too high risk for too little benefit and shouldn't be done until we have a really compelling reason to introduce a forking change. The first really compelling reason I can think of is removing the MAX_BLOCK_SIZE limit (but does something clever to prevent the rogue-miner-sends-you-a-valid-10Terabyte-block attack). -- -- Gavin Andresen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA Learn about the latest advances in developing for the BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
