The right one is "providers", yet there is probably some package out with "provider", so i'm expecting to allow both in the end because we botched it in such a stupid way.
Maria On 6 January 2025 10:28:28 CET, Job Snijders <j...@sobornost.net> wrote: >On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 09:32:45AM +0100, Maria Matejka via Bird-users wrote: >> Hello, >> >> there is a discrepancy between doc and parser. Please try >> >> s/providers/provider/; > >Are you sure? > > $ sed -i 's/providers/provider/' ./bird > > $ bird --version > BIRD version 2.16 > > $ bird -c ./bird -p > bird: ./bird:642145:17 syntax error, unexpected PROVIDER > >> Sorry for the inconvenience. We'll fix this in the next version. > >It seems https://bird.network.cz/download/bird-2.16.tar.gz wants >plural 'providers', but >https://pkg.labs.nic.cz/bird2/pool/main/b/bird2/bird2_2.16-cznic.1~bullseye_amd64.deb >wants singular 'provider' > >both report 'BIRD version 2.16' as the version string > >I'd like to know ASAP whether it's going to be 'providers' or >'provider', because I'd like to ship an rpki-client release which can >output BIRD compatible configuration for ASPA :-) > >Kind regards, > >Job -- Maria Matejka (she/her) | BIRD Team Leader | CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.
