The right one is "providers", yet there is probably some package out with 
"provider", so i'm expecting to allow both in the end because we botched it in 
such a stupid way.

Maria

On 6 January 2025 10:28:28 CET, Job Snijders <j...@sobornost.net> wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 09:32:45AM +0100, Maria Matejka via Bird-users wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> there is a discrepancy between doc and parser. Please try
>> 
>>  s/providers/provider/;
>
>Are you sure?
>
>       $ sed -i 's/providers/provider/' ./bird
>
>       $ bird --version
>       BIRD version 2.16
>
>       $ bird -c ./bird -p
>       bird: ./bird:642145:17 syntax error, unexpected PROVIDER
>
>> Sorry for the inconvenience. We'll fix this in the next version.
>
>It seems https://bird.network.cz/download/bird-2.16.tar.gz wants
>plural 'providers', but
>https://pkg.labs.nic.cz/bird2/pool/main/b/bird2/bird2_2.16-cznic.1~bullseye_amd64.deb
>wants singular 'provider'
>
>both report 'BIRD version 2.16' as the version string
>
>I'd like to know ASAP whether it's going to be 'providers' or
>'provider', because I'd like to ship an rpki-client release which can
>output BIRD compatible configuration for ASPA :-)
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Job

-- 
Maria Matejka (she/her) | BIRD Team Leader | CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.

Reply via email to