Hi, I have installed scikit-learn at Tuesday:
biocbuild@kunpeng2 ~/git [1]> python -m pip install scikit-learn Requirement already satisfied: scikit-learn in /home/biocbuild/miniconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages (1.6.0) Requirement already satisfied: numpy>=1.19.5 in /home/biocbuild/miniconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages (from scikit-learn) (2.2.1) Requirement already satisfied: scipy>=1.6.0 in /home/biocbuild/miniconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages (from scikit-learn) (1.14.1) Requirement already satisfied: joblib>=1.2.0 in /home/biocbuild/miniconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages (from scikit-learn) (1.4.2) Requirement already satisfied: threadpoolctl>=3.1.0 in /home/biocbuild/miniconda3/lib/python3.11/site-packages (from scikit-learn) (3.5.0) Since then the check fails with: biocbuild@kunpeng2 ~/git> R CMD check seqArchR_1.11.0.tar.gz * using log directory ‘/home/biocbuild/git/seqArchR.Rcheck’ * using R Under development (unstable) (2024-11-24 r87369) * using platform: aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu * R was compiled by aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 GNU Fortran (GCC) 14.2.0 * running under: openEuler 24.03 (LTS) * using session charset: UTF-8 * checking for file ‘seqArchR/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK * checking extension type ... Package * this is package ‘seqArchR’ version ‘1.11.0’ * package encoding: UTF-8 * checking package namespace information ... OK * checking package dependencies ... OK * checking if this is a source package ... OK * checking if there is a namespace ... OK * checking for hidden files and directories ... OK * checking for portable file names ... OK * checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK * checking whether package ‘seqArchR’ can be installed ... OK * checking installed package size ... OK * checking package directory ... OK * checking ‘build’ directory ... OK * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK * checking top-level files ... OK * checking for left-over files ... OK * checking index information ... OK * checking package subdirectories ...Warning: program compiled against libxml 212 using older 211 OK * checking code files for non-ASCII characters ... OK * checking R files for syntax errors ... OK * checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK * checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK * checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK * checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK * checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK * checking loading without being on the library search path ... OK * checking whether startup messages can be suppressed ... OK * checking dependencies in R code ... OK * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK * checking replacement functions ... OK * checking foreign function calls ... OK * checking R code for possible problems ... OK * checking Rd files ... OK * checking Rd metadata ... OK * checking Rd cross-references ... OK * checking for missing documentation entries ... OK * checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK * checking Rd \usage sections ... OK * checking Rd contents ... OK * checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK * checking installed files from ‘inst/doc’ ... OK * checking files in ‘vignettes’ ... OK * checking examples ... OK * checking for unstated dependencies in ‘tests’ ... OK * checking tests ... Running ‘testthat.R’ ERROR Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed. Last 13 lines of output: ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ── Error ('test_seqArchR_main.R:149:5'): seqArchR (cv) works when timeFlag is FALSE ── Error: cannot find an open port. For manually specifying the port, see ?SnowParam Backtrace: ▆ 1. └─seqArchR::seqArchR(...) at test_seqArchR_main.R:149:5 2. └─seqArchR:::perform_setup(...) 3. └─BiocParallel::MulticoreParam(workers = crs, tasks = crs) 4. └─BiocParallel:::.snowPort() 5. └─BiocParallel:::.stop("cannot find an open port. For manually specifying the port, see ?SnowParam") [ FAIL 1 | WARN 1 | SKIP 4 | PASS 104 ] Error: Test failures Execution halted * checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK * checking package vignettes ... OK * checking re-building of vignette outputs ... OK * checking PDF version of manual ... OK * DONE Status: 1 ERROR See ‘/home/biocbuild/git/seqArchR.Rcheck/00check.log’ for details. It is not clear to me which port it tries to use and why the official build run still does not see scikit-learn ... I will reboot the VM once the daily build finishes later today and try again! On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 9:15 PM Jennifer Wokaty < jennifer.wok...@sph.cuny.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > All builds passing now, except for an issue with kunpeng2, which I'm > discussing with Martin on #arm-linux on the community Slack. I may invite > you to join us there if we get stuck. > > > Jennifer Wokaty (they/them) > > Waldron Lab at CUNY SPH > Bioconductor Core Team > ------------------------------ > *From:* Bioc-devel <bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org> on behalf of Martin > Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> > *Sent:* Monday, December 9, 2024 3:34 AM > *To:* Sarvesh Nikumbh <sarvesh.niku...@gmail.com> > *Cc:* Bioc-devel <bioc-devel@r-project.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Bioc-devel] Package check errors Fwd: seqArchR problems > reported in the Multiple platform build/check report for BioC 3.21 > > * This email originates from a sender outside of CUNY. Verify the sender > before replying or clicking on links and attachments. * > > Hi, > > This issue should be fixed on kunpeng2 in the next build run (the results > will be available two days from now). > > Regards, > Martin > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 7:58 PM Sarvesh Nikumbh <sarvesh.niku...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Dear Bioc team, > > > > I am seeing check errors on nebbiolo1 and palomino7 and build and install > > error on kunpeng2 for my package "seqArchR". The check errors are due to > > the missing Python module scikit-learn, and others are due to > dependencies > > not being available. I believe this is being looked into by the team. > > Please let me know if you need anything from my side to get this > resolved. > > > > Thanks and best wishes, > > Sarvesh > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > From: <bbs-nore...@bioconductor.org> > > Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 at 22:30 > > Subject: seqArchR problems reported in the Multiple platform build/check > > report for BioC 3.21 > > To: <sarvesh.niku...@gmail.com> > > > > > > [This is an automatically generated email. Please don't reply.] > > > > Hi seqArchR maintainer, > > > > According to the Multiple platform build/check report for BioC 3.21, > > the seqArchR package has the following problem(s): > > > > o ERROR for 'R CMD check' on nebbiolo1. See the details here: > > > > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.21/bioc-LATEST/seqArchR/nebbiolo1-checksrc.html__;!!LRXxDv2l!SAm81ssftyYCFtEnWDLRGhmNLFYQviFOkWffrugLy_nNcfjwOCASVtR1LMdj9ZYFn9I03NRsIbuvToqCRon2i_GuHmcXzA$ > > > > Please take the time to address this by committing and pushing > > changes to your package at git.bioconductor.org > > > > Notes: > > > > * This was the status of your package at the time this email was sent > to > > you. > > Given that the online report is updated daily (in normal conditions) > > you > > could see something different when you visit the URL(s) above, > > especially if > > you do so several days after you received this email. > > > > * It is possible that the problems reported in this report are false > > positives, > > either because another package (from CRAN or Bioconductor) breaks > your > > package (if yours depends on it) or because of a Build System > problem. > > If this is the case, then you can ignore this email. > > > > * Please check the report again 24h after you've committed your changes > > to the > > package and make sure that all the problems have gone. > > > > * If you have questions about this report or need help with the > > maintenance of your package, please use the Bioc-devel mailing list: > > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bioconductor.org/help/mailing-list/__;!!LRXxDv2l!SAm81ssftyYCFtEnWDLRGhmNLFYQviFOkWffrugLy_nNcfjwOCASVtR1LMdj9ZYFn9I03NRsIbuvToqCRon2i_GWDRO4ew$ > > > > (all package maintainers are requested to subscribe to this list) > > > > For immediate notification of package build status, please > > subscribe to your package's RSS feed. Information is at: > > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bioconductor.org/developers/rss-feeds/__;!!LRXxDv2l!SAm81ssftyYCFtEnWDLRGhmNLFYQviFOkWffrugLy_nNcfjwOCASVtR1LMdj9ZYFn9I03NRsIbuvToqCRon2i_HCYkxsMQ$ > > > > Thanks for contributing to the Bioconductor project! > > > > > > > > -- > > > > thanks! > > -Sarvesh > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > Q: Why is this email five sentences or less? > > A: > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://five.sentenc.es__;!!LRXxDv2l!SAm81ssftyYCFtEnWDLRGhmNLFYQviFOkWffrugLy_nNcfjwOCASVtR1LMdj9ZYFn9I03NRsIbuvToqCRon2i_HhFiC8nA$ > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel__;!!LRXxDv2l!SAm81ssftyYCFtEnWDLRGhmNLFYQviFOkWffrugLy_nNcfjwOCASVtR1LMdj9ZYFn9I03NRsIbuvToqCRon2i_GRPrF1nw$ > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel__;!!LRXxDv2l!SAm81ssftyYCFtEnWDLRGhmNLFYQviFOkWffrugLy_nNcfjwOCASVtR1LMdj9ZYFn9I03NRsIbuvToqCRon2i_GRPrF1nw$ > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel