On 09/06/2017 03:51 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Hervé Pagès <hpa...@fredhutch.org> wrote:
Hi,
Personally I like replaceSlots() better.
Not only because it's more readable but also the fact that you can use
initialize() to update an existing object is an undocumented feature so
I prefer to not rely on it.
It seems documented to me:
In the default method, unnamed arguments in the ‘...’ are
interpreted as objects from a superclass, and named arguments are
interpreted as objects to be assigned into the correspondingly
named slots.
But before that paragraph:
The generic function 'initialize' is not called directly. A call
to 'new' begins by copying the prototype object from the class
definition, and then calls 'intialize()' with this object as the
first argument, followed by the ... arguments.
There are no examples showing the use of initialize() for updating an
existing object. So one has to kind of guess that it is OK to call
initialize() directly and in a context that is different from
initialization (i.e. on an "existing" object, not just on the prototype
object).
Might be obvious for S4 wizards but I like my code to be readable by
the average developer. First time I saw the use of initialize() for
updating purpose (a few years ago), I found it quite confusing.
Granted, it could be made a lot more explicit, and it's just the
behavior of the default method, not a general contract.
Also initialize() is a generic and there could be a method defined for
the object you're trying to update that won't behave the way you expect
(e.g. the names of its arguments won't necessarily match the names of
the slots).
This is a good point. Another best practice is not to override (or at
least change the contract of) initialize(), but you're right, there's
no protection against it. The documentation does make some
recommendations along these lines.
Also validation can be expensive and there are many situations where
you know that you're replacing the object slots with thiings that
don't break the object so I like that I can call replaceSlots() with
check=FALSE.
I actually wish the methods package had something like replaceSlots().
Patches welcome ;)
Fair enough...
H.
H.
On 09/06/2017 01:11 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
No, the best practice is to just use initialize(). It used to be that
replaceSlots() saved some copying, but that's no longer really the
case. The only potential benefit is that it can skip validity checks,
but usually you want those.
Michael
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Vincent Carey
<st...@channing.harvard.edu> wrote:
Is this the preferred way of adjusting content in a
live object? It is not accessible except via ":::"
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=iXa2JnAchBDp8QpTOD4yZHTEXOMu5gjBfDOMcvQCriU&s=0Rbio7Sp7SXzPgU4xGDGkWA7V-tkgkDizVkI9JMYQ2g&e=
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwICAg&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=iXa2JnAchBDp8QpTOD4yZHTEXOMu5gjBfDOMcvQCriU&s=0Rbio7Sp7SXzPgU4xGDGkWA7V-tkgkDizVkI9JMYQ2g&e=
--
Hervé Pagès
Program in Computational Biology
Division of Public Health Sciences
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514
P.O. Box 19024
Seattle, WA 98109-1024
E-mail: hpa...@fredhutch.org
Phone: (206) 667-5791
Fax: (206) 667-1319
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__stat.ethz.ch_mailman_listinfo_bioc-2Ddevel&d=DwIFaQ&c=eRAMFD45gAfqt84VtBcfhQ&r=BK7q3XeAvimeWdGbWY_wJYbW0WYiZvSXAJJKaaPhzWA&m=6jaO_yQwpjdZEFRgOpXkRE3c70db9_YaNxuNsE0140U&s=bs9EQpJB6q_flBgWbNRGmBomFlpxmxFbWiGakiz1uuc&e=
--
Hervé Pagès
Program in Computational Biology
Division of Public Health Sciences
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514
P.O. Box 19024
Seattle, WA 98109-1024
E-mail: hpa...@fredhutch.org
Phone: (206) 667-5791
Fax: (206) 667-1319
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
