Agreed with Sean, having tried implementing to "magical" alternative
--t > On Sep 20, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Sean Davis <sdav...@mail.nih.gov> wrote: > > Hi, Vince. > > I'm coming a little late to the party, but I agree with Kasper's sentiment > that the less "magical" approach of using subsetByXXX might be the cleaner > way to go for the time being. > > Sean > > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Vincent Carey <st...@channing.harvard.edu> > wrote: > >> >> https://github.com/vjcitn/biocMultiAssay/blob/master/vignettes/SEresolver.Rnw >> >> shows some modifications to [ that allow subsetting of SE by >> gene or pathway name >> >> it may be premature to work at the [ level. Kasper suggested defining >> a suite of subsetBy operations that would accomplish this >> >> i think we could get something along these lines into the release without >> too much more work. votes? >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
