On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Julian Gehring <julian.gehr...@embl.de>
wrote:
> Hi Herve,
>
>
> 2) A 'dropMcols' or 'dropmcols' method with signature 'GRanges' that is
>>> a wrapper for
>>> mcols(x) <- NULL
>>>
>>
>> How about setMcols(), which is more general than dropmcols()?
>>
>>
> Do you mean a function like:
>
> setMcols <- function(x, value = NULL) {
> mcols(x) = value
> return(x)
> }
>
> I'd be fine with this. However, some argued before that setting to NULL
> may be counterintuitive for non-advanced users.
>
>
Probably best to have both setMcols and dropMcols.
> Best wishes
> Julian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> bioconduc...@r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.
> science.biology.informatics.conductor
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
