Hi Petr, Thank you for the quick response. Yes, I said it before, the utilization stayed high. :) I checked it now and I can see increased network traffic, memory and disk utilization for the same time period.
Kind Regards, Laszlo On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 09:14, Petr Špaček <pspa...@isc.org> wrote: > On 04. 03. 25 9:53, Laszlo Szollosi wrote: > > Many thanks for your response. > > By mitigation, I mean we have seen an increase in resource utilization, > > but it would have been much worse without the 'minimal-responses' > > setting (reduced impact). > > By prevention, I mean we would not have had the impact at all. > > By a spike, I mean the CPU utilization jumps, and then falls. That is > > not what we experienced. We had the resource consumption continuously > > for 3 hours on our first incident. > > Oh, that's very important 'detail'. If it were CVE-2024-11187 it would > have to be correlated to increased traffic. If the resource utilization > lasted so long without corresponding high traffic it is probably a > different bug. > > -- > Petr Špaček > Internet Systems Consortium >
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
