On 04. 03. 25 9:53, Laszlo Szollosi wrote:
Many thanks for your response.
By mitigation, I mean we have seen an increase in resource utilization,
but it would have been much worse without the 'minimal-responses'
setting (reduced impact).
By prevention, I mean we would not have had the impact at all.
By a spike, I mean the CPU utilization jumps, and then falls. That is
not what we experienced. We had the resource consumption continuously
for 3 hours on our first incident.
Oh, that's very important 'detail'. If it were CVE-2024-11187 it would
have to be correlated to increased traffic. If the resource utilization
lasted so long without corresponding high traffic it is probably a
different bug.
--
Petr Špaček
Internet Systems Consortium
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
