Greg Choules via bind-users <bind-users@lists.isc.org> writes: > What's a "primary master" as opposed to (presumably?) a "secondary master"?
Some servers will be both masters and slaves when using hierarchical replication. It is useful to define the root of the tree as "primary master" and refer to any upstream from a "slave" as "master". IMHO, "primary"and "secondary" alone are confusing terms in this context. But I guess it's possible to make the distinction clearer by adding more text, so it's not a big deal. Personally I am mostly worried about the potentional number of technical terms we have not yet identified as "bad". The set of words we may have to replace in the future is virtually unlimited. Most colours are obviously risky. So are any terms which could be used to describe a person or body part. In any language if we're going to be translation safe. Not sure where to draw the line. Are the 2024 rules final, or are we going to continue this whack-a-mole game forever? Bjørn -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
