On Tue, 5 Nov 2024, Malcolm Scott wrote:
Regardless I'll try adjusting the algorithm choice in case it does make a difference.
So far I can report that using a ECDSAP384SHA384 key for the SIG(0) still encounters the same failure mode. (For tedious reasons the client I chose to test can't do ED25519. More experimentation ongoing. But the problem is not specific to RSASHA512.)
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
