> On Apr 12, 2022, at 6:36 AM, Timothe Litt <l...@acm.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12-Apr-22 01:46, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> Does anyone use LOC RR's?  And if so, how?
>> 
>> I've had some Apple devices get seriously confused by their location 
>> services and I'm trying to provide strong hints.
>> 
>> It would also be nice to prime WiFi 6 Certified WAPs with their locations 
>> based on LOC RR's since we happen to have convenient infrastructure to do 
>> exactly that.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> 
> LOC RR's are not currently very popular.  But I have some where they provide 
> different locations from geolocation services based on IP address.  Google, 
> for one, reports the city from the LOC record in preference to data 
> associated with the IP address.  I haven't looked recently, but last time I 
> looked, the geolocation services' use of LOC was spotty.  Some used LOC, 
> other's didn't.  For them, it's pretty cheap to mine WHOIS and address block 
> assignments; doing a DNS lookup for each address (and walking up the tree on 
> a miss) gets expensive fairly fast.
> 
> There are some concerns with overly precise LOC records - great if you want a 
> shopper to to show up at your store, perhaps less so if you run a shelter or 
> secure facility.  I've been known to intentionally misplace LOC records so 
> that they're good enough for routing, census, and other coarse applications, 
> but not accurate enough for navigation.
> 
> With respect to part 2: You might also consider that GPS receivers are cheap 
> (every cellphone has one) and retail USB receivers are easily found at less 
> than $20.  This may be a better choice than LOC records.  GPS tells you where 
> you are; LOC tells everyone else...
> 
> HTH
> 
> Timothe Litt
> ACM Distinguished Engineer
> --------------------------
> This communication may not represent the ACM or my employer's views,
> if any, on the matters discussed. 
> 


That's where things get interesting with WiFi 6 Certified Location: it's 
potentially accurate to a few centimeters if it's done correctly.

I have Ubiquiti UAP-AC-Pro's which don't support this feature, but could if 
Ubiquiti bothered to add the functionality (it's not on their roadmap as far as 
I can tell).

In my case, I do split-horizon for my domain in-house and use RFC-1918 
addresses, so leaking them with the internet would be pointless anyway.

I'm doing the LOC record matching the domain for now.

I could have LOC records for the WAP's to pre-provision them, but like I said, 
Ubiquiti isn't caught up yet.

-Philip

-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to