Am 17.02.22 um 17:36 schrieb Jakob Bohm via bind-users:
This is truly tragic, and quite counterproductive action by ISC.
no, it's just stop wasting time for things not really used in the real
production world
Messing about with docker virtualization inside an already virtual
machine seems like a recipe for disaster
nobody said that
when you already have a virtualization infracstructure the far better
question is why you did install named on a windows guest to begin with
BTW: docker is *not* virtualization and i would *always* install any
containers inside virtual machines because on production hardware the
only thing which belongs to bare-metal is the hypversior (yes, there are
*very few* expections, contgainers are non of them)
why? because there is redundancy, hot migration, backup-infrastructure
and so on - the only usecase for containers is lightweight isolation for
the few cases a systemd-unit with proper namespaces and cgroups isn't enough
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from
this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
