Jakob, > On 17. 2. 2022, at 17:31, Jakob Bohm via bind-users > <bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > > This is truly tragic, and quite counterproductive action by ISC.
quite the contrary, this is very productive action by ISC as it allows the development team to focus on the things that really matter. The time spent on Windows build doesn’t come free, and after several calls nobody stepped up neither with offer to do the work or pay for the work. Open source and free software doesn’t mean that the open source maintainers have to work for free, only that you can use the results for without paying royalties. This is a huge difference. ISC would not drop the Windows support if it would mean we could make BIND 9 better. But it’s the exact opposite - we can make BIND 9 better for most people because we have dropped the Windows support and don’t have to worry about the compatibility layers and weird quirks of the Windows SDK. Also we are not actively rejecting the idea of having Windows port - and I think I pretty much explained the conditions the ISC would accept the Windows port in the previous emails. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@isc.org My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
