I attach a picture to best describe where I'm standed at.

https://i.postimg.cc/x8PKnz53/ejemplo-com.png

Currently disabled the SH setup to let just an authoritative DNS for
local resolution. Following the example, any request made from PC1 to
sys4/sys5/sys6 have no issues. However, if such host makes a request
to sys1/sys2/sys2 just get a time out response.
Any other query to outside, let's say google.com or whatever, works just fine.

El lun, 26 jul 2021 a las 13:29, Sten Carlsen (<st...@s-carlsen.dk>) escribió:
>
> Hi
>
> I am running just that setup.
>
> This may not scale well enough for your needs.
>
> I have one server with two views, one internal and one external.
>
> The external view is the hidden master for a number of public servers. All 
> going through the relevant delegations. This is only authoritative.
>
> The internal view is selected by the client address and master files for the 
> same domain but with my internal addresses. This is recursing and will answer 
> from the master files for those domains and will recurse for any other query.
>
> This has served me well and e.g. I get the internal address for the mail 
> server if I query from an internal address and I get the public address if I 
> query from an external address.
>
> This setup means that mail clients will make a lookup of the same name always 
> and if at home get the internal address and if outside get the public address.
>
> There is often a recommendation to use different domains, e.g. 
> xxx.example.com for public addresses and xxx.internal.example.com for the 
> same servers internal addresses. This is not very useful since e.g. a mail 
> client would have to know about two different server names - with split 
> horizon I can use the same name always.
>
> --
> Best regards
> Sten Carlsen
>
> A pessimist is a person that can find a problem for every solution.
>
>
> On 26 Jul 2021, at 15.55, Daniel A. Rodriguez 
> <daniel.armando.rodrig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> Currently have a public DNS up & runnin' but, due to brand new
> location, there's a need to add local resolution.
>
> With that in mind, first idea was to deploy a split horizon setup.
> Sadly just local resolution works so far. Double check config but
> currently I'm stuck with this situation.
>
> Was wondering if having the same zone both public and private, but
> with different records, could be an issue. Master for the zone is
> public, of course, and the private one -as mentioned- has a different
> set of records just for lan hosts. Idea was to go out just when a
> query for a public subdomain is requested, but that desn't seem to
> work.
>
> Both forwarders option and recursion are enabled.
>
> Any hint will be much appreciated.
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
> from this list
>
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
> Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
>
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to