Hi I am running just that setup.
This may not scale well enough for your needs. I have one server with two views, one internal and one external. The external view is the hidden master for a number of public servers. All going through the relevant delegations. This is only authoritative. The internal view is selected by the client address and master files for the same domain but with my internal addresses. This is recursing and will answer from the master files for those domains and will recurse for any other query. This has served me well and e.g. I get the internal address for the mail server if I query from an internal address and I get the public address if I query from an external address. This setup means that mail clients will make a lookup of the same name always and if at home get the internal address and if outside get the public address. There is often a recommendation to use different domains, e.g. xxx.example.com <http://example.com/> for public addresses and xxx.internal.example.com <http://internal.example.com/> for the same servers internal addresses. This is not very useful since e.g. a mail client would have to know about two different server names - with split horizon I can use the same name always. -- Best regards Sten Carlsen A pessimist is a person that can find a problem for every solution. > On 26 Jul 2021, at 15.55, Daniel A. Rodriguez > <daniel.armando.rodrig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi there, > > Currently have a public DNS up & runnin' but, due to brand new > location, there's a need to add local resolution. > > With that in mind, first idea was to deploy a split horizon setup. > Sadly just local resolution works so far. Double check config but > currently I'm stuck with this situation. > > Was wondering if having the same zone both public and private, but > with different records, could be an issue. Master for the zone is > public, of course, and the private one -as mentioned- has a different > set of records just for lan hosts. Idea was to go out just when a > query for a public subdomain is requested, but that desn't seem to > work. > > Both forwarders option and recursion are enabled. > > Any hint will be much appreciated. > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. > Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
