Of course I could, but I do not feel like the effort to change
nomenclature is either beneficial or worth taking for granted the
requests of some people on Twitter - as the slave to peer authority I am
- given how much it affects documentation, code, comments, general
environment of the projects themselves. I enjoy being surrounded by
people much smarter than I am when it comes to the mailing list here.
Let's keep it that way and not derange ourselves into meaningless
blabber from social media.
What I did notice over time however that most of the projects affected
are also those who do have to maintain a good public image, usually
corporations. Meanwhile projects such as Opal
<https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941> and recently Rubocop
<https://github.com/rubocop-hq/rubocop/issues/8091> as well were not.
The latter one I'd like to draw attention to. The maintainer clearly
didn't ask for this and asked everyone who shamed him, why are you doing
this? None of the complainers were affiliated to the project at all.
Chances are that they weren't even using it and just searched for
projects with the name "cop" in it instead. These are not the people I
want to support in my effort to end racism, which I /do/ support, and
quite heavily so.
On 6/15/20 8:00 PM, DeCaro, James John (Jim) CIV DISA FE (USA) wrote:
Or you can call the slave servers 'secondary' servers.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Best regards,
Michael De Roover
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
