On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 4:34 PM, Grant Taylor via bind-users < bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
> On 02/08/2018 08:51 AM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > >> Also, just for argument's sake, one user wants to extend TTLs to 5s. >> Another wants 60s TTLs. What is OK and what is going too far? >> > > I think what is "OK" is up to each administrator. > > Obviously the zone administrators have decided that they want people to > use the 2s TTL. > > That being said, it is up to each individual recursive server operator if > they want to honor what the zone administrators have published, or if the > recursive administrators want to override published desires. > > It really is something for the zone owner to consider. >> > > Yes and no. Yes it's up to the zone owner to consider what intentions > that they want to publish. No, the zone owner has no influence on how I > operate my servers. I choose how I operate my servers. > > If I choose to operate my servers in a manner that ignores the zone > owner's published desires, that's on me. > > I feel like this discussion is really two issues: 1) Does the capability > to override published values and 2) should I use said capability. They > really are two different questions. I personally would like to see BIND > have the option to do #1, even if I never use it. > > +1 > > -- > Grant. . . . > unix || die > > -- Bob Harold
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
