On 02/08/2018 08:51 AM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
Also, just for argument's sake, one user wants to extend TTLs to 5s. Another wants 60s TTLs. What is OK and what is going too far?
I think what is "OK" is up to each administrator.Obviously the zone administrators have decided that they want people to use the 2s TTL.
That being said, it is up to each individual recursive server operator if they want to honor what the zone administrators have published, or if the recursive administrators want to override published desires.
It really is something for the zone owner to consider.
Yes and no. Yes it's up to the zone owner to consider what intentions that they want to publish. No, the zone owner has no influence on how I operate my servers. I choose how I operate my servers.
If I choose to operate my servers in a manner that ignores the zone owner's published desires, that's on me.
I feel like this discussion is really two issues: 1) Does the capability to override published values and 2) should I use said capability. They really are two different questions. I personally would like to see BIND have the option to do #1, even if I never use it.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
