On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 12:45 +0000, Tony Finch wrote: > > They'll have a log category of edns-disabled.
But if the problem were EDNS, would it be so intermittent and always fixable by rndc reload? > But, looking through the > code, if this is leading to lameness you will also get lame-servers > log > messages. So just looking for lame servers will cover EDNS issues also then, right? > lame-servers is also a log category, and tends to be quite noisy > about > various problems :-) Yeah. Must be disabled by default on EL7 I would guess, just because it's so noisy. > The tagged values there are various kinds of things that happened > when > resolving; the lame: tag is a count of the lame servers that were > encountered, including both newly discovered lame servers and cached > lame > servers. So, if lame servers were a problem with resolving ns[1-4].google.com, then I would see messages like in my previous message with a lame:n tag where n > 0, yes? Cheers, b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
