Brian J. Murrell <br...@interlinx.bc.ca> wrote: > > Am I interpreting this correctly? If so, why would these queries come > back with responses with no answers?
Those responses look like referrals from the root servers to the .com servers; I would expect you to see `named` repeating the queries as it follows the iterative resolution algorithm. If it thinks it is talking to Google's nameservers when it gets that response, then something VERY screwy is happening. (Another advantage of the 9.11 packet tracing change I mentioned previously is that it logs the remote IP address of upstream queries and responses, handy for working out what `named` thinks it is talking to.) Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode Trafalgar: Northerly or northeasterly 5 or 6, becoming variable 3 or 4 except in southwest. Rough or very rough, but slight or moderate in southeast. Fair. Good. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
