On 22.07.17 21:51, Abi Askushi wrote:
I was wondering if bind9 can support TPROXY. This would facilate my
accounting as then all WAN traffic would have the client IP as the source
IP. ( I have a similar configuration with squid where I was able to
account
the WAN traffic using this trick without having to deal with squid stats
and cache)
On Jul 23, 2017 16:19, "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
again: why don't you simply traffic between the bind server and clients?
On 23.07.17 16:53, Abi Askushi wrote:
Because i would like to avoid counting traffic for cached responses. But
this is an option also if all other are not easy.
will you avoid billing user's traffic just because it was cached? it's you
who cached it, not the user, you should benefit from that, not them.
(only by reducing costs and resulting lower prices)
this way your clients can pay less money for more traffic just because it
was in the cache already...
and you even spend your time and money to bill them less.
not mentioning that DNS is rarely relevant when counting network traffic.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Christian Science Programming: "Let God Debug It!".
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
