Because i would like to avoid counting traffic for cached responses. But this is an option also if all other are not easy.
On Jul 23, 2017 16:19, "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: > On 22.07.17 21:51, Abi Askushi wrote: > >> I was wondering if bind9 can support TPROXY. This would facilate my >> accounting as then all WAN traffic would have the client IP as the source >> IP. ( I have a similar configuration with squid where I was able to >> account >> the WAN traffic using this trick without having to deal with squid stats >> and cache) >> > > again: why don't you simply traffic between the bind server and clients? > > > -- > Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ > Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. > Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. > Windows found: (R)emove, (E)rase, (D)elete > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to > unsubscribe from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users >
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
