I've reverted my configuration back to before we started using views. But, if this was a delegation issue, wouldn't we expect to see it regardless of using views or not? Works fine without views.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Matthew Pounsett <m...@conundrum.com> wrote: > > > On 16 September 2016 at 11:12, project722 <project...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I have an interesting problem. I started noticing that when I do a dig >> +trace against one of the domains we are authoritative for, we get errors >> from our nameservers for "Bad Referral" and you can see where it forwarded >> the request back up the namespace tree instead of giving the answer. >> Unfortunately I am unable to reproduce this problem at the moment. However >> I can reproduce the Bad (HORIZONTAL) referral. Basically once the query is >> referred to our name server I see this: >> >> ;; BAD (HORIZONTAL) REFERRAL >> ;; Received 187 bytes from x.x.x.x#53(ns.example.com in 2 ms >> > > A horizontal referral is when one authoritative zone (the parent) > delegates a subdomain to a server that responds out of the same parent > zone, rather than a subzone. The DNS is an inverted tree structure, and > delegations are always supposed to be "down" the tree toward the leaves. > If a delegation ends up being across, then you get a horizontal referral > error. > > Since you obfuscated your configuration nobody is going to be able to > provide you with specific advice on where the problem is. If you can find > the error in your authoritative data (or share which zone is giving you > problems so that someone here can point it out) that should clear up your > issue. >
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
